I’ve just received an email from a friend saying that this blog has become a bit technical. I’ve been chasing ratings: I want to keep those people interested in screenwriting and editing coming back for more. That means I’ve neglected family and friends. Sorry about that!

It’s been two weeks and two days of the course and everything is going well. We’ve had an interesting project a week. The first was a short documentary piece – cutting ten minutes of raw footage down to a short piece about using chainsaws to carve wood. Last week’s project was making a scene for an indie movie. This was made more difficult as the twenty minutes of footage was complete improvisation – shot with a single camera, which kept in a close up trying to keep up with three people arguing around a dinner table.

This week finds us working on a scene from a comedy film called ‘The Marconi Bros.’ It is still in post, but we have access to all the takes and setups from a single scene. The lead actor in the film will be hitting your screens this summer in ‘Balls of Fury.’

Sorry the entries on other subjects have been so long. If you skip those and look for the ones categorised ‘Alex,’ the amount of stuff here will be easier to get through.

Alternatively, you can click the Alex category button on the list to the right to see a list of just those entries. Click the title of an entry to read the full text.

Went to my second New York screenwriters Meetup. The script under discussion had the theme of ‘Being happy is more important than knowing the truth.’ An uncompromising first draft that has the heroine fool herself into not believing the truth in order to be happy. You can download the script from the home page for the group if you’re intrested.

Didn’t stay as long this time but heard some interesting ideas: a murder-mystery featuring screenwriters, a modern faith-based animated epic for adults and a Sci-Fi spectacular set in The Sun.

‘Jerusalem Idol’ will be the script under discussion at the next meeting.

That’s the thing about being a professional editor. You need to make it seem that whichever system people provide, that’s the one you are most happy to use.

So I’ve started writing a guide to Avid for Final Cut users. If any of it doesn’t make any sense, please comment!

From the book First Cut: Conversations with Film Editors

Tom Rolf, editor of French Connection II, Taxi Driver, War Games, 9 1/2 Weeks, Jacob’s Ladder and Heat:

If you play too much on one side of the screen and not come around and play on the other, it starts titling and it’s uneven storytelling. As a guiding force, I tend to cut on punctuation. Any kind of hesitation gives me the chance to get in and come around the other side. But to cut arbitrarily in the middle of a word drives me crazy. Some people do it, and I thing that’s just carelessness and/or they don’t have an ear for it, or they disagree with me! So be it. We’re in the same field as the storytellers but we’re providing the images. We’re not using your imagination like radio, but showing you what’s there. So you have to be careful of the rhythm. At the end of WarGames, when there were so many different elements coming together – there was a bomb, a nutty colonel, codes – they all had to mesh. I think I went back and reworked three and four times until the rhythm was right.

There are no absolutes in cutting films. I do have some self-imposed rules that are as close to absolutes as they can be. I hate to cut straight in. I try never to leave an empty frame of anything for any reason; there always has to be something, even if it’s a mood that you want to try with a sound effect like crickets and birds. I never put music in when I run a cut with a director because I think music gives a false sense of confidence that the scene is working. The one false element in any movie is the music. It’s totally emotional and out of left field, and I’ve always had a little problem with it because I think it tends to support the picture. To run a cut, put in a few sound effects, like gunshots or birds or wind, whatever the story is, just so it isn’t totally dry. I’d much rather hear if the story is working. They you know if you augment it with music, you can make it that much more compelling. Putting music in too early allows the fat to remain on the film because it becomes more acceptable.

I like to overlap a lot, a personal preference. Another of my minor laws, I never let an actor start his dialogue offstage. He should start onstage and then segue into whoever else is reacting to it…

…Since you’re dealing with diplomacy, it’s a difficult position to be in sometimes, and if you’ve got a very big ego yourself, then you’ve got a problem. If you’re bright enough to discuss a problem or to try and change someone’s mind because it makes sense, great. You could be strong in that way. When someone says “What do you think?” and you say, “I think that it’s shit and you ought to reshoot it,” that’s strong enough! But you can’t be a lackey, you have to be your own person…

…Editors have to be malleable, have a good sense of humour, and be patient. I’m basically a lazy editor, so that the first time I cut something, I try to make it as good as it can possibly be, knowing that in the back of my head that I’m going to go back anyway and change it anyway because although it might be good for that sequence it might not be good for the overall picture. But I don’t think concsciously that I have to go back and coompress the picture. So I make my overlaps, stretch my dialogue, fill my tracks. I do all the things that many editors in their first cuts don’t bother with. They call it an assembly. I make a first cut. I do not like what I am doing to be referred to as a rough cut.

…A lot of times you want to get lazy. ‘I’ll fix it later.” Once you do that, you’re sunk. You think, “When I go through it again, I’ll catch it.” You never do, or if you try it’s too late.

It may be that you have a plot that suggests a theme, or a theme you need to find a plot for, but choosing a compelling theme is very useful when developing your screenplay.

Some people see screenplays as arguments on a given theme. All the characters take positions on the theme. Minor characters’ single lines state a position on the theme. Subplots explore unintended consequences of the theme. Major characters can debate the theme directly. Some can even present the argument in monologues. If you need a subject for minor characters to be talking about, turn to the theme.

The better themes can be argued more than one way. If everyone can agree on the point of the story, there’s not much point in debating it. In most cases you’ll be able to guess at the majority opinion, but great debating comes from being able to present the opposite point of view from what you believe yourself.

Themes can usually be presented as questions as well as statements:

Ambition leads to destruction OR Does ambition lead to destruction?

Themes can be presented as opposites

Ambition leads to destruction OR Indolence leads to destruction

In the first act the protagonist is unaware of the theme – their actions illustrate the negative aspects of disagreeing with the theme. In the second act the antagonist’s plans force the protagonist to react by acting as if they agreed with the theme without realising or agreeing with the statement of the theme. At the start of the third act the protagonist realises what lessons they have learned, come to an understanding of the theme and then make a choice to act in such a way that demonstrates the statement of the theme is correct.

If your cop movie’s theme is “Ambition leads to destruction”, the protagonist acts according to the theme throughout the story. In the first act we are introduced to a cop whose ambition leads her into many frustrations: she’s come to believe that whatever she does, the entrenched system will stop her from getting the position that she deserves in the force. We are also introduced to the antagonist: a corrupt cop who believes that no rules should stop them from getting to the top – ambition works for him.

In the second act, the antagonist’s plans come up against the protagonist. During a series of dilemmas, the protagonist has to choose to act as if ambition is the wrong choice – for example, she takes the blame for the antagonist’s corrupt action. In the second act the actions of the antagonist seem to demonstrate that “ambition leads to success.”

In the end of the second act, the protagonist sees the results of actions she has taken. They have led her to the darkest possible place, but she realises that she has been making the right choices (possibly for the wrong reasons – she discovers that what she wanted wasn’t enough, she realises what she needs). In the third act, she uses the tools and ‘anti-theme’ against the antagonist to demonstrate that she is in agreement with the theme and to illustrate the perils in disagreeing.

Here are some debates that you might find fun in debating:

Integrity is rewarded
Free will is possible
Know your place
Love survives beyond death
Forgiveness is weakness
You can never lose at a game you don’t play
Dedication leads to success
Technology solves all problems
There is not fate but what we make
Faith leads to conflict
Tradition is more important than love
Freedom is more important than responsibility
Greed is good!

Have a look at some of the ideas you’ve been coming up with recently. If you look for the debates within the stories, you might see the themes that you want to debate at this point in your life. If you write a journal, the topic that you are most unsure of is the theme you need to write about.

Even if your target market is far from your personal ‘demographic’ you’ll be most comfortable writing about something that matters to you. The important thing to do is to make your theme so universal that the debate is relevant to your audience, even if you aren’t a member of that audience. This is how women in their fifties write comedies for teenagers…

…with no capital ‘H’ – so that’s the London Soho…

…my friend Suzanne Cohen has just got her film into the Soho Shorts Festival. It’s about memory and change, death and rebirth and Arsenal football club. If you’re in London I hope you go and check it out. As soon as I know what day it’s on, I’ll update the blog.

Over to NY Perks, a very nice venue in Brooklyn, for an evening of short films, including my friend Miles’s premiere of his second short film: Man Up. Got there just in time to be introduced to Jimmy Mar. He is the nicest nutter you could meet. He’s like a cross between Ice Cube and Kevin Smith, but scaled up to giant size. He’s one of the actors in Miles’s film. He and Mr. Robinson are developing a feature film that combines elements of ‘Do the Right Thing’ and ‘Friday.’

The first thing we saw was a trailer for a film with an unusual love triangle. Between a man, a woman and god…. The first short we saw was Squirrel Man by Jeffery Lynn Shepherd. This award winning short uses comedy and action to tell an age-old story in an original way. Once you see this film, you’ll never see feeding squirrels in the park in the same light.

Miles’s film, Man Up came next. It had the same themes as Squirrel man, but was just as unpredictable and original. I would be suprised if you could predict the ending of this one!

The third film was another award-winner: Gabrielle by Stephanie la Keem Jones. This touched on completely different themes – to do with fate and choice and taking the rough with the smooth. It had the feeling of a Twilight Zone episode…

The next projects therefore are the Jimmy Mar project, and a horror film that Miles has the ideal location for…

I also met the lovely Arie Thompson, who is launching an EP at a party next week in Manhattan. She seems like a real go-getter. She had an idea a few weeks ago, put it in motion, and next week she launches more music out into the world. I know it shouldn’t matter, but she’s even more beautiful in person.

The big event on the course today was our visit to Outpost Digital.

I thought that our wonderful tutor Jamie Hitchings would be giving us a tour. Our guide was Evan Schechtman. The tour was of much more than the facility – it was a no holds barred tour of how to get into the post industry.

He gave us a whirlwind tour:
1. The shared storage in the server room
2. A soundproof, prefabricated editing room
3. A larger room to host work done on commercials
4. A visit to the graphics department

…and we spent the rest of the time in an amazing conference room where Evan told us the truth about the post industry.

Evan started Outpost Digital in 1998. It is postproduction company built on the principles of using mass-market Mac hardware and commercially available Mac software to do everything that the other companies were doing with dedicated hardware and software systems. They have offices in both coasts and have strong links with companies all over the world. They have survived the last few years by knowing that their competitors aren’t the big facilities houses with kit that no one can afford. They need to make a case to entice those people who think that they can do it all at home on their multi-core Intel MacPro.

The technical ideas at the heart of their business are rock-solid reliable shared storage, and a deep understanding of compression and codecs. The shared storage (combined with flexibility of Final Cut Studio) means that any room with a Mac can be used for any task you might need in a post-production workflow. If a computer blows up, all you need to do is go into the room next door and continue editing. If a huge job suddenly comes in, all the computers in the facility can be roped in to help with the rendering or compression. In the case of compression and codecs, once you know how to compress video at high quality for an acceptable data rate, you can use consumer products to play, review and edit footage and projects. There’s no need for tens of HD playback systems when the output can be played back from any computer to any screen.

Enough with the advertising. Evan then talked about how to be a successful freelancer at Outpost Digital. He talked at twenty to the dozen, but I was able to make a few hurried notes (stuff in brackets is from me):

1. The more you know, the more powerful you are. The more you understand the software, the systems and the hardware the better. There is no ‘barrier to entry’ – all the software and information is out there for you to learn from.

Don’t be a PC user – he’ll probably be able to tell, and you won’t get the job.

HDV is the work of the devil. Get to know DVCPro HD. Apple’s Compressor is your friend. You might need to use another piece of software a bit earlier in your pipeline to prepare your video for Compressor. That’s Outpost Digital’s ‘secret sauce’.

2. Stop telling yourself that you are an individual: you are a business.

As soon as you finish your conversation with the person who is hiring you, send them an email confirming the verbal contract you have with them. Start that paper trail that both you and them will be able to follow.

Make sure that you turn up on time – by aiming to be there early.

Don’t be afraid to say ‘I don’t know’ – it is much better to say ‘I don’t know’ instead of guessing how to carry out a task and wasting hours getting it wrong. As soon as you say ‘I don’t know’ that is when you start learning.

You can dress how you like – as long as your underwear isn’t showing.

Speak clearly – in English. People need to understand what you are saying.

No breath or body odour. Carry gum if you need to.

Make sure you have all in the information with you on the first day for any required paperwork to be filled in.

Accounting is key. As soon as you finish the job send TWO invoices. The first goes to ‘Accounts Receivable’ via the old-fashioned postal system. State on your invoice who approved your hiring, and say when you want to get paid. This is usually ‘Net 30’ – if you have pre-arranged it, you could put ‘Due on receipt.’ The second invoice can be sent via email to the person who approved your hiring.

3. Your reel

Make sure you stick to one set of abilities. If you are a cameraperson, motion graphics designer and director as well as an editor, make the reel you send in just cover your work as an editor. If you get the job, and once people get to know you, then you can give them a reel of your motion graphics, or of films that you shot but didn’t edit.

Don’t waste time with complex ‘original’ DVD packaging. You don’t want to demonstrate your ability as a packaging designer. Use a standard Amray case. They stack well, go up on the shelf, their spines can be recognised from across the room.

Don’t go the other way and use a sharpie on a bit of paper. Get a good label for the DVD itself that goes some way towards hiding the brand of DVD-R you used to burn your reel onto. Make sure your name and contact details are on the disc label as well as the case – useful if the disc gets separated from the packaging.

Don’t waste time with an advanced DVD front-end. Unless you want work creating DVD front-ends. Demonstrate that you know about what typefaces and colours aren’t screwed up by the medium of DVD. The simpler you make it, the better.

Don’t lie about your contribution to a piece included in your reel. You will be found out. Make it clear what you are responsible for. Include a two or three line case study summary to clearly explain what you did.

If you have worked on long-form projects, choose two-minute segments that represent the best of your work. If you have a large variety of work, choose a piece of music and create a montage to match the music. Don’t put every edit on a beat – it may be easier to do that, but you should demonstrate a bit more variety in your choices.

4. Your abilities
A. Your skill
B. Your understanding of media, history, aesthetics
C. Your ability to get on with a wide range of people. You need the patience of a saint. You need to be a person the client doesn’t mind being with during a long render. If someone is hard to work with, you should have no problems at all with them.

5. Creativity by committee
Especially when producing commercials, you need to be able to deal with large groups of people coming to decisions in your presence. Many people feel that they haven’t made a useful contribution unless they suggest some sort of change. They feel that it might be bad politically if they say ‘I’m fine with that, I don’t think we need to do any more work on that.’ People need to justify their presence in these meetings. (My friend Matt Davis says that people like this feel that they always need to ‘mark their territory.’ It’s people like this that we have to clean up after.)

The worst examples of this are the ‘Frame Fuckers’. These people suggest moving an edit by single frames at a time. For these people you need to know the art of the zero-frame edit. You press a few keyboard shortcuts, re-arrange some windows, and play the unchanged sequence again saying ‘There, do you think that’s better?’ Nine times out of ten, they will say ‘See, I think that’s a lot better.’ (During yesterday’s masterclass with Bill Pankow, he said that most movie directors never talk in terms of how many frames to move an edit by. They just say ‘we need a little more’ or ‘a little less there’)

(Ironically, I’ve worked with some brand managers who have to handle ad agencies as suppliers, and most of the time the people from the agency do not know enough about the products they are selling and the brand idea they should be following. The ads they make are for their showreels and kudos from within the advertising industry.)

Went to MPEG this evening for Bill Pankow‘s editing masterclass.

He showed clips from the films he’s worked on over the years – including a deleted musical number from the Black Dahlia – burnt onto a DVD from his Avid this very morning.

Here are some of the things he said during and after the seminar.

If you have to choose between making a smooth cut between to a performance that isn’t so great and a jarring cut to the best performance, go for performance very time: “Performance is King… or Queen”

When you’re up for a job editing a film with a director that’s new to you, you get to close the deal by having a short interview. These last for twenty minutes or so, and revolve around the screenplay of the proposed film. As the editor, you should have read the screenplay and be able to come up with various complimentary things to say about it. Bill says that you on to a pretty sure thing by saying that the third act needs a lot of work, because the third act always needs a lot of work.

The director will want to know how forceful you’ll be about any ideas you want to contribute. Some directors what editors who will challenge their conceptions of the film, others want a pair of hands who won’t volunteer any of their own ideas. It’s up to the individual editor to work out if they can be one or the other. The main point of the meeting is to see if you’ll be able to get on with each other over a period of many months working together.

When starting a job, Bill likes to read around the subject. Sometimes the books are quite tangential to the source of the screenplay story, but he never knows what elements will bubble up from his reading and influence his ideas when making editing choices about the film.

Bill says that editors “make a large contribution to the writing of films.”

The highlights will be posted at the new section of the Manhattan Edit Workshop website known as ‘The Vault’ – a place where you can access clips of many famous editors talking tradecraft at previous masterclasses.

Jamie’s word of the week: Redonkulous. A fair description of the editor’s deal memo I’ve concocted. It’s for an imaginary editor with a lot of clout, because I was challenged not to leave anything out. Here is my attempt:

A huge deal memo

This is inspired by the course that I’m on, and by my friend Matt Davis, who’s helping me get more professional. I’ve been working as a freelance designer and editor for over seven years now, and have never needed any kind of contract. I’ve been very lucky with the clients I’ve worked with. The advantage of a document like this is that it codifies the agreement editors have with production companies.

That’s the health warning, it’s an approximation that is a good starting point for negotiation (once you’ve removed the clause about business-class travel to premieres)…

…for non deal-makers, at least you now have a new word to play with.