BruceX: Try this new Final Cut Pro X benchmark
To help people work out which Macs work best with Final Cut Pro X, it is useful to refer to a standard speed test.
All but one of the MacBook Pros with Retina configurations do not have dedicated GPUs. New Mac software is depending more and more on GPU power. Editors want to know if the integrated Intel Iris and Iris Pro Graphics GPUs are powerful enough to run professional software well.
Early testing shows that Iris Pro graphics are better than many expected. Take a look at a new post at Bare Feats:
In the past we sneered at the integrated GPUs and their puny performance. Not any more. The Intel Iris and Iris Pro are every bit the match or master of discrete NVIDIA Mobile GPUs — at least when it comes to OpenCL acceleration.
Although it is great news that integrated GPUs are getting better, many are worried that the MacBook Pros should be avoided until Iris Pro has improved a little more.
A speed test proposed by FCP.co was to time the render of Final Cut Pro X’s built-in ‘Far Far Away’ title on a 23.975 1080p timeline. This test puts enough pressure on main memory and GPU memory to separate older generation Macs from more recent computers.
Over at the the FCP.co forum, qbe asked me to do the ‘Far Far Away’ test on my new late 2013 MacBook Pro 15″ using only the built-in Iris Pro Graphics and also on only the Discrete GeForce GT 750M GPU which I included in my BTO Mac.
It turns out that the test wasn’t tough enough to show a difference between the two GPUs:
MacBook Pro late-2013 Discrete GeForce GT 750M 2GB 18.8 seconds
MacBook Pro late-2013 Intel Iris Pro Graphics 1GB 19.2 seconds
I’ve come up with a test that shows the differences between these GPUs and other Macs…
The BruceX benchmark
BruceX is a small Final Cut Pro X XML file that you import into Final Cut Pro. It creates a very short timeline at a high resolution: 5120 by 2700 (at 23.975 fps). It uses standard Final Cut generators, titles and transitions. As it uses many layers of complex content, it requires lots of GPU RAM.
The Bruce X benchmark is based on timing how long a Mac configuration takes to export the project.
Short instructions
To use this, open the Final Cut Pro library at
https://Alex4D.com/BruceX.fcpbundle.zip
…and time the export of a 5K master file from the timeline.
Detailed instructions
1. Have both QuickTime Player and Final Cut Pro open at the same time.
2. In Final Cut Pro, go to ‘Final Cut Pro:Preferences…’ – in the Playback tab make sure ‘Background render’ is off.

3. Make sure no libraries are open. Open the BruceX.fcpbundle library which contains a very short but complex 5K project.
4. Click the new ‘BruceX Test – 5K ‘ project timeline (this makes the Share command selectable)
5. Export the QuickTime movie by choosing “File:Share:Master File…’
6. In the dialogue box that appears, click the ‘Settings’ Tab
7. In the ‘Video Codec’ section choose a flavour of ‘ProRes’

8. From the ‘When Done’ pop-up menu, choose ‘Open With QuickTime Player’

9. Click the ‘Next…’ button in the bottom-right of the dialogue box
10. In the Save sheet, choose a name and location for the export – export to your fastest drive connected using your fastest connection.
11. Get your stopwatch ready and time from when you click ‘Save’ until you see the movie open up in QuickTime Player.
12. If possible do the export at least three times. Your configuration’s BruceX Score is the average export time in seconds. Before timing the next export, restart Final Cut (otherwise the exports speed up each time because X does a little caching renders to save time).

These results include those posted at the FCP.co Forum and from BareFeats.com.
The results show that BruceX tests processor power, but also shows that Iris Pro Graphics has some way to go to match a discrete graphics GPU in the new MacBook Pro 15″ with Retina
MacBook Pro late-2013 2.6 Ghz Quad Core i7
16GB 1600 MHz
1 TB SSD
Discrete GeForce GT 750M 2GB GPU
OS X 10.9.0
88 seconds
MacBook Pro late-2013 2.6 Ghz Quad Core i7
16GB 1600 MHz
1 TB SSD
Iris Pro Graphics 1GB GPU
OS X 10.9.0
163 seconds
( To choose which GPU to use for the test on my MacBook Pro, I used gfxCardStatus by Cody Krieger – a Shareware app downloaded from gfx.io )
15-inch, Mid 2012 MBP
Processor 2.6 GHz Intel Core i7
Memory 8 GB 1600 MHz DDR3
Graphics NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M 1024 MB
My result after the average of three exports: 135 seconds, exporting to a 5400rpm external drive via Thunderbolt. Seems to be right about where it should be according to the other findings, given the drive speed.
Interesting test.
53 second average
Late-2013 27-inch iMac 14,2
3.5gHz i7
Memory 32GB 1600 MHz DDR3
Graphics NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M 4096MB
27inch iMac, mid 2011
3.4ghz Intel i7
16GB RAM
AMD Radeon HD6970M
average time 49:39
Hackintosh
Ivy Bridge 4.2GHz
32GB RAM
AMD 7970
time 30.5
From results two instances are noted. Hack with 660Ti took really long, acording to specs it should be way more powerful than 750m, but that is a hack and i for one know, cannot take it as general rule/basis without broader specimens.
The second instance worth noting is performance of previous rMBP (early 2012), 750m should be only little faster than 660m, the big difference here is amount of VRAM. This reason is, by my opinion, also hindering Iris Pro in this particular instance, as the test is really complex for GPU and as shown in Anandtech test, when Iris Pro is set on higher detail or resolutions (in games, DirectX or OpenGL, but i assume behaviour should be same in OpenCL), it starts slow down rather fast due to low amount of VRAM (or the whole igpu shared ram system to make things worse)
As there are no other test except one very easy and one very complex, i assume that for basic stuff with FCP-X Iris Pro is sufficient, but for heavy lifting or other apps nvidia 750m is actually very handy.
I only assume though, but will wait for more tests (barefeats), as i would love one of the new machines, but I need it only for easy stuff in FCPX, i have desktop for all the heavy lifting. Previous generation rMBP become viable alternative though, which makes the decision harder.
Thanks for the test and your time Alex4D, much apreciated!
ps: sorry for my english
correction in coment above this:
…750m should be only little faster than 650m,…
175 sec average on a
Mac Pro 2 x 2,26 GHz Quad Core (early 2009)
12 GB RAM
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB
179 sec average on:
iMac (2010), 3.2GHz, i3
12GB RAM (DDR3)
Graphics: ATI Radeon HD 5670, 512MB
MacbookPro e2011 17″ 16GB NO SSD + THB Display + WD THB Raid
134sec not so bad..
44 seconds
Mac Pro (Hackintosh)
Processor 3.89 GHz Intel Core i7
Memory 16 GB 1600 MHz DDR3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST 20
Software OS X 10.9 (13A603)
Intel SSD drive 180GB
FCPX 10.0.9
Wow. Is there something wrong with my Mac?
Took 1hr 14m 03s to complete!
15″ MacBook Pro 2.4 i5 (mid 2010)
8gb 1067 ddr3
750gb internal hdd (5400)
Mac OS X 10.7.5 (11G63)
FCPX 10.0.8
My ram is maxed out, other than adding an ssd, looks like I need a new Mac, right?
27″ iMac 2.66 i5 (late 2009)
16 Gb RAM @ 1067 MHz DDR3
ATI Radeon HD 4850 512 MB
HDD 1Tb (270 Gb free space)
Mavericks OS
FCP X 10.0.9
Time: 3 minutes 2 seconds
Here are my results, all with Mavericks 10.9.0, FCPX 10.0.9 and rendered to SSD.
MacPro 2008 8x 2,8GHz
20GB RAM
NVidia GTX 570 2560MB
Time: 110 seconds
MacBook Pro Early 2011 i7 2,3GHz
16GB RAM
ATI 6750M 1024MB
Time: 160 seconds
Old Hackintosh Intel i5-760 3.8GHz
8GB RAM 1600MHz
ATI 6870 1024MB
Time: 93 seconds
I tested my new Hackintosh with different GPU configurations:
Hackintosh Intel i7 4770K 4,3GHz
32GB RAM 2133MHz
Internal Graphics Iris Pro, Intel HD4600:
Time: 138 seconds
Intel HD4600 + ATI R9 280x (single and dual)
Time: 53-62 seconds
Single ATI R9 280x (HIS IceQ Boost Clock) Internal GPU disabled
Time: 26 seconds
Dual ATI R9 280x (HIS IceQ + Gigabyte Windforce 3x OC Rev.2) Internal GPU disabled
Time: 22 seconds
Interesting to see that FCPX doesn’t scale very well with multiple GPUs (yet). Especially with enabled Intel HD everything is bottlenecked by the internal graphics (at least on my Hackintosh). LuxMark on the other hand scales much better:
Scene: Sala (Medium Benchmark)
1x ATI 2260-2440
2x ATI 4670
2x ATI + Intel = 4900
But I guess that’ll change with OSX 10.9.1 and FCPX 10.1 with support for the new mac pro.
Interesting…
Working with a Hackintosh
Intel 4.2 GHz Core i7
32 GB Ram 1600MHz DDR3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 2048 MB
Time: 68 seconds
*however* the output file is just a blank black video….
Any thoughts on what may be happening here? I was wondering if there any settings I may have missed…
Generally runs well but I’ve felt that the render of the regular vids I’ve been working on has been slow… That said they are still coming out perfect, so I am scratching my head why the BruceX vid is blank
Any help or suggestions is always appreciated.
Dr George
hi there, maybe a stupid question but does this translate into 1080p rendering. I have for example 20+ h of a conference to render. How long will this take with the 280x, HD 7950 and h3000? Thanks
hi will this transform back to 1080p render speed? how long would it take me to render 1 h of 1080p (no special effects, just some title) with a R9 280x vs HD 7950 vs gtx 760 vs Intel HD4000? or will this increase in speed only be noticeable while rendering much higher then 1080p video? Thanks
iMAC 27″ Late 2012 (3,4 GHZ Intel Core i7 “Ivy Bridge”)
Mavericks 10.9.1
FCP 10.1
RAM: 32 Go 1600 MHZ DDR3
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX 2048Mo
on LaCie 7200 RPM (FW800): 75 seconds
on internal drive (Fusion SSD 128 Mo and HD 3TO 7200 RPM): 74 seconds
The test doesn’t work with H.264 export (error message from FCPX, whatever the player is)
Works with PRORES 422
The same happens to me. I googled for the error code (-12348) but nobody has an answer.
On ProRes 422(HQ) 1 min 24 sec.
iMac 27″: 3,4 GHz Intel Core i7; 24 GB 1600 MHz DDR3; NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX 2048 MB
external HDD : LaCie 3TB, 7200rpm, Thunderbolt.
Hackintosh
Intel Core i7 3.5 GHz
16 GB Ram 1600MHz DDR3
XFX AMD Radeon™ HD7970
MSI R9 280X GAMING 3G
SSD 240GB SanDisk Extreme
Mavericks 10.9.1
FCP 10.1
Time: 16 seconds
MBhttp://my.mail.ru/video/mail/a.holzwart/_myvideo/11.html#video=/mail/a.holzwart/_myvideo/11
Hackintosh
Intel Core i7 3.5 GHz
16 GB Ram 1600MHz DDR3
Dual ATI
AMD XFX Radeon™ HD7970
AMD MSI R9 280X GAMING 3G
Time: 16 seconds
http://my.mail.ru/video/mail/a.holzwart/_myvideo/11.html#video=/mail/a.holzwart/_myvideo/11
it is kind of rookie of you to export 720p and post your score here for 5K…
Yep, it really seems like AMD cards have a massive advantage on OpenCL. I have a GTX 670 and it also seemed very slow compared to some very similar cards on the AMD side (I’m thinking about the 7950, maybe 7970, which are about as fast as the GTX 670/GTX 760. I went NVIDIA because of CUDA acceleration in AE and other 3D stuff and mostly due to better support with Hackintoshes. I always knew OpenCL on AMD was WAYYY better, but I’m still quite shocked by the result..
My specs:
4.2 GHz i7 3770k
16GB 1866 MHz RAM
Samsung 840 EVO 500GB
Zotac GTX 670 AMP! 2GB (this card is one of the best 670s, quicker than a lot of 680s. Also a bit faster than the GTX 760)
Time: 65 seconds
So to make a closer test the mac mini’s tested should have a 7200rpm drive or SSD, I believe and this is an educated guess that part of the disparity in the graph above isn’t JUST the video card but also writing the render results/cache to disk on a 5400 rpm drive
iMac 2009
Core i7 2,8 GHz
8 gb Ram
ATI Radeon HD 4850 512 Mo
HDD intern
Time : 216s…
OUCH ! Time to get a new Mac Pro 😉
Thanks for this test! Unfortunately I’m echoing what Ben said, for me this export won’t work in H.264. I can get it to work on PRORES 422 with no problem but that doesn’t help me judge against every one else’s benchmarks.
I made sure other projects will export on H.264 and trashed and reloaded the BruceX XML file and tried again but got the same results:
“Share Failed”
The share operation “Master File” has failed.
The operation could not be completed because an error occurred while exporting (error -12348).
Shucks. This was exactly the test I was looking for. If anyone has any suggestions I’d love to hear them.
MBP 17in, Early 2011
2.2 GHz i7
16 GB 1333 DDR3 RAM
AMD Radeon HD 6750M 1024 MB
Mavericks 10.9
FCPX 10.1
For what it’s worth I went through a dozen threads on how to fix export problems. As far as I can tell this is project specific as I can export other H.264 projects.
Mac Pro Quad Core 2 x 2.66 GHz (2006 model)
16 GB RAM
ATI Radeon HD 4770 1024 MB
3 x 500 GB Striped RAID Set (Blackmagic Disk Speed Test reports 150.7 MB/s Write and 167.8 MB/s Read)
Final Cut Pro X
Mac OS X 10.7.5 (can’t upgrade!)
3 minutes 9 seconds
My MacBook Pro 15″ Mid 2009 2.7 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo with 8 GB RAM and NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT 512MB wouldn’t even render it out, Final Cut Pro X would stop after 20 seconds and report an error.
Time for an upgrade?
I tried to run this on the newest Mac Pro late 2013, maxed out with 12-cores, 64 GB’s of RAM and 1 TB SSD + D700 and I got an error. FCPX was at the newest version too.
Ideas?
Thanks for trying – it is a bug in 10.1.1 – people who have upgraded have been exporting as ProRes instead
I’m guessing exporting to ProRes is not comparable to H.264?
Got my buddy to run it on a Hackintosh:
i7-4770K @ 4.6/4.5/4.4/4.4 (1/2/3/4 cores) GHz
32 GB RAM
Asus R280X
2x Kingston HyperX 3K 480GB in RAID 0
25 secs.
I ran it on my iMac too:
iMac11,1 (late 2009)
i7 2.8 GHz
12 GB RAM
Kingston HyperX 240GB
Dammit forgot the result.
2 mins, 26 secs = 266 secs.
146 seconds.
I’m getting this error.. The operation could not be completed because an error occurred while exporting (error -12348).
Due to bugs in 10.1.X concerning H.264 BruceX results are for ProRes export for now.
Apple ProRes 422 HQ – 27 seconds –
Apple Mac Pro 6 core / D500 / 512Gb SSD / 32Gb ram
150 seconds. 2 mins and 30 seconds on Macbook Pro Retina 13 Inch, Late 2013, 16gb Ram. For me good enough!
2010 Mac Pro 3.33 GHZ 6 core, 12 GB RAM.
Geforce 680 (4GB RAM): 1 minute 47 seconds
Radeon 7950 (3GB RAM): 41 seconds
Dual R9 280X (3GB RAM each): 28 seconds
Not too shabby for an old machine. Definitely not as fast as the hackintoshes with 280Xs, but I’m not complaining.
2013 Mac Pro
Processor 3,5 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon E5
Memory 32 GB 1867 MHz DDR3 ECC
Graphics AMD FirePro D700 6144 MB
Software OS X 10.9.2 (13C64)
G-Raid 8TB Thunderbolt
11 seconds :))
Better than hackintosh….
really better?)
Hackithosh
Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD5H
Intel i7-4770k 3.5 GHz (internal graphics HD4600 on)
Sapphire R9 390(non-x) 8192 MB
Memory 32 GB 1600 MHz DDR3
OS X 10.11.1
13 seconds, lol
3930K @ 4.5Ghz
32GB RAM
GTX 770 4GB
HyperX SSD
OS: 10.9.2
80 Seconds! Very disappointed.
Same system here (64GB RAM, though), same results. WTF??? I think I may have to sent the 770 back and get a radeon instead…Not impressed. Our systems should be SMOKING this test.
17.04 Seconds. Hackintosh
4930K @ 4.5Ghz
R9 280X x 2
32Gb Ram
10.9.2
27-inch Mid-2010 iMac
Processor 2.93 GHz 4-Core Intel Core i7
Memory 12 GB 1333 MHz DDR3
Graphics ATI Radeon HD 5750 1024 MB
OS: 10.9.2
Used Internal 2TB 7200RPM Hitachi for export
71 seconds
2009 Mac Pro
Processor 2 x 2.26 GHz Quad- Core
Memory 8GB 1066MHz DDR3
Graphics: 2 x Geforce Gtx 560ti 1024MB each
OSX: 10.9.3
FCP 10.1.1
Wrote to SSD
Average Time: 100 seconds
Custom Built Hackintosh dual Radeon 7950 3GB I7-3930k OC to 4.4
20.48 sec
Hello !
Testing my new Hackintosh i7 3770k@4.4ghz + MSI R9 280x 3Gb
OSX 10.9.3 – FCPX 10.1.1
export ProRes (tried with two different ones, same results)
time : 29 seconds !
2008 Mac Pro (3,1); 2 x 2.8 GHz Xeon, 16GB RAM, twin Radeon 5770’s
FCP 10.1.1, OS 10.9.3
Export to SSD
38 secs
Hackintosh Build:
CPU: i7 4790K@4GHz
Memory: 8GB 1866MHt DDR3
Graphics: Sapphire R9 290X Tri-X OC 4096MB
OS X: 10.10 (Yosemite)
FCP: 10.1.3
26,5 sec
2007 Mac Pro 2.1 2X 8 Core 2.66 Xeon, 1 Sapphire AMD 7950
6GB RAM, Kingston v300 SSD
FCP 10.1.3, OS 10.9.4 (via boot.efi hack)
80 seconds
Hey I dont know why but ever since I upgraded my softwares my export time went up.
Mavericks 10.9.3 & FCPX 10.1.2: 26-27 secs.
Yosemite 10.10 & FCPX 10.1.3: 34-36 secs.
Can anybody explain this?
13″ MBP non retina Early 2011 2.3Ghz i5 8gb RAM, Intel HD3000 512MB export to USB3 drive – 264 seconds to playing QT
Again for comparison on lower spec machines:
Mac mini Late 2012 2.5Ghz i5 16gb RAM Intel HD4000 to USB3 drive – 207 secs
Mac Pro Late 2013
Processor 3.5 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon E5
Memory 64 GB 1867 MHz DDR3 ECC
Graphics AMD FirePro D700 6144 MB X 2
Software OS X 10.9.5 (13F34)
1 TB Flash Storage
FCPX Version 10.1.3
iMac 27″ Late 2013
Processor 3.5 Ghz intel Core i7
Memory 32 GB 1600 Mhz DDR3
Graphics Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M 4096 MB
Software OS X 10.9.5
3 TB Fusion
So rendering H.264 failed to export Error 12348. So rendered BruceX in Prores 422
Mac Pro took 19.7 seconds from start to opening in QT. file size 71.5 MB
iMac took 93.4 seconds 73 MB
So I didn’t change any hardware settings on the iMac don’t know if it was using the iris or Nvidia. humm that is related to MacBooks only.
The Mac Pro is on loan from apple. We are testing it between our iMacs. When testing compression of 720p videos on green screen with background power points and audio compressions and color correction the mac pro took 2 times the rendering time of the iMac’s 4 minutes and 23 seconds render time with our 27 mins and 4 sec video. FCPX library size for project is 35.91 GB. shared as exported file with better performance selected. resolution 1280×720 QT. file size .99 GB with the iMac and file size with Mac Pro was 1.5 GB. After researching why the iMac out performed the Mac Pro, tell me if i’m wrong, but the Mac Pro’s GPUs can not be used when compressing videos on single pass, but the iMac can.
Same test but selecting for better quality. and the mac pro wins at 16 mins and 40 secs. the iMac took 20 minutes and 30 seconds.
Can anyone explain this. with better quality are we now getting into the double pass rendering where the mac pro’s GPUs can be utilized?
I’m doing another test, but will share as mater file pro res 422. Mac pro took 3 mins and 59 secs. file size 14.47gb iMac is still rendering …. 83% okay iMac took 6 mins. with the same file size
This is fun another test. redering master file uncompressed at 10 bit. hummm estimated size 123 GB. Never mind.
What do you think?
Late 2013 rMBP 15 inch – bought in 2014 when speed bumps announced
2.6GHz i7 Quad-core
16GB 1600MHz DDR3
1TB PCIe SSD
GT 750M 2GB
OSX 10.10 Yosemite
FCPX 10.1.3
77 seconds to internal SSD
Pingback: Dual GPU Hackintosh, Worth It? | mymac 4 music
Hackintosh
Core i7 3770K
Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UP5 TH
16 GB Corsair RAM
SoftRAID 5 (4x3TB)
Yosemite 10.10.1 (256 GB SSD)
Final Cut Pro X 10.1.3
With GTX 660Ti – 110 sec
With Asus R9 290-DC20C-4GB – 35 sec
Custom Mac Pro 4.1@5.1:
1xX5650 (6×2,66 ghz)
24 gb DDR3 1333 mhz
Rendered to system SSD.
Two GPUs tested:
GTX 660 2 gb (from Gainward. Must be the GTX 660 that has official nVidia clocks):
147 seconds!!!
A little disappointing: some nVidia cards less powerful than this one (GT 650m, GT 750m, GT 755m, etc). I think that Apple is doing some “tweaking” in FCPX to make it run faster on nVidia GPUs integrated in their iMacs and MacBook Pro Retina.
Gigabyte Radeon 7950 3gb flashed for boot screens (a bit overlocked by default, as the GPU is running at 900 mhz instead of 800 mhz):
First run: 60 seconds!
A great improvement.
Second run after flashing the card: 75 seconds!!!!
I did not find an answer until I realized that once flashed, the GPU is working at 2,5 GT/s (That´s PCIE 1.0). So I removed the R17 transistor and boom!
Third run: 60 seconds again!
So it seems that PCIE speed is really important for FCPX with powerful GPUs.
I also did a test with Luxmark (default scene): with 2,5 GT/s the result was 1750 and when activating the PCIE 2.0 mode the result was a bit higher: 1860.
Hackintosh mid-2014 – Built for FCPX 4K
28 seconds
i4770K 4core/8thread 3.5ghz OC to 3.9ghz
Gigabyte Z87x-UD3H
Gigabyte Radeon 280x 3mb vram
16 GB G.Skills Ripjaws X 1866mhz CL9
Crucial 512mb 500w/r SATA III 6gb/sec Boot Drive
Various WD Black 7200rpm 3TB internally on SATA for media
2 monitors
Dell UP2414Q – 4K
Apple Cinema Display – 1080
Just added another 16gb of same ram for total of 32gb. Still 28 sec.
Only change is about 15% increase in Geekbench ram numbers.
But Motion is a little quicker.
I specifically went for AMD for the openCL performance, and wasn’t disappointed. It was pretty much plug and play.
I am going to add a second Gigabyte 280x in a couple of weeks.
MacBook Pro 15inch mid 2010
Core i7 Dual Core 2.66MHz (620m)
8GB RAM
256GB SSD
Nvidia 330M GT 512
~275 seconds
Its was a dissapointment these results to me as I was expecting greater improvement of retina rMBP with 750m over my current mac, as I am thinking of purchasing the new retina Macbook pro in order to improve my Final Cut Pro X experience.
HACKINTOSH – MAC PRO 2013 – 29 sec
———————————————————-
CPU: i7 2600K
RAM: 16Gb Hdd
MB Gigabyte Z77 D2H
SSD: SX900 256Gb
HDD DATA: 2 x 1000 Gb IN RAID0
VGA: MSI 280x 3Gb
I HAD PREVIOUSLY :
1x Radeon 7950 – 45s
2x Radeon 7950 – 29s
I have a similar system. What did you export too? Prores 422 HQ?
Pingback: BruceX Score - AMD Radeon R9 280X 3072 MB vs. ATI Radeon HD 5870
I have compared an
ATI Radeon HD 5870 1024 MB: 75 seconds
with an
AMD Radeon R9 280X 3072 MB: 75 seconds
in my Mac Pro 12-core (Mid 2010) 2 x 2.66 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon, 64 GB 1333 MHz DDR3 ECC, Samsung SSD 840 EVO 500GB
I don’t understand why I got the same score for both cards.
When I look on the chart above a Mac Pro (2010) 12-core 3.64 with a Radeon 7950 is so much faster with 38 seconds.
Do you think there is a problem with the AMD Radeon R9 280X 3072 MB?
750m scoring is pretty better than 650m and Iris pro because BruceX benchmark is using both GPU simultaneously (IRIS PRO & 750m). Yes… Macbook pro retina with 750m have the capacity of using both GPU simultaneously, but the developer have to support that.
Previous: ATI Radeon 4870, 512mb.
New: Radeon 7970, 3gb flashed with boot screens and 5.0 gt/s
Mac Pro 2009, dual 2.93ghz, 16GB 1066mhz memory
SSD main drive, OWC Mercury Electra 3G, 240gb with TRIM enabler app.
BruceX test:
4870: 2 minutes 18 seconds
7970: 37 seconds
Maxon Cinebench R15 Open GL:
4870: about 11fps (didn’t save my screenshot I guess)
7970: 51fps
Unigine Heaven 4.0 on 1920×1200 monitor
4870: 18fps, min 8, max 35.6
7970: over 55fps for most of the test (aborted before finished)
February 24, 2015 (happy Steve Jobs 60th b-day)
MBP retina 13 (2,6, 8gb, 128SSD) 2014
With safari browsing and watching youtube video (about 10 tabs open), Mail, leaf, twitter, itunes, spotify, App Store and pages open and uptime of 7 days and change, it took 188 seconds.
Pretty happy with the result for a 13 laptop 🙂 (luckily I would never edit nothing in 5k, or even higher than 1080p for the near future, so performance is more than adequate).
just tried an apple store Retina iMac, with a 2GB Video Card and 3.5 i5 and 8gb of ram, and it hit 52.5 seconds to pro res. Just was curious if the beautiful display would take too much wind out of the machines sails. They didn’t have a max spec model of course.
Pingback: Promesses de Final Cut Pro X 10.2 | D-O-F (Depth of Final)
Hackintosh. I switced from Asus R9 290 to Gigabyte R9 280X OC
Core i7 3770K
Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UP5 TH
16 GB Corsair RAM
SoftRAID 5 (4x3TB)
Yosemite 10.10.3 (256 GB SSD)
Final Cut Pro X 10.2.1
Radeon R9 280X
BruceX test: 28 sec
Ok just had some time to kill at the apple store so I did some tests 🙂
All test are on the latest macs on the Apple Store showroom floor as of June 2015!
===============================================================
MacBook Pro 15 inch 2.2Ghz i7, 16Gb Ram, Iris Pro with 1.5Gb = 60s
iMac 21inch, 2.7GHz quad-core Intel Core i5, 8Gb Ram, Iris Pro with 1.5Gb = 60s
MacBook Pro 13 inch, 2.7Ghz i5, 8Gb Ram, Intel Iris 6100 with 1.5Gb = 130s
Macbook (the little guy),1.1Ghz, 8Gb Ram, HD5200 with 1Gb = 165s
not at the Apple Store and a blast from the past ……
My old i5 2012 mac mini – 2.5 GHz Intel Core i5, SSD and 16 Gigs Ram, HD4000 Graphics with 1Gb = 190s
Lessons learnt.
=============
1- Go for something with an Iris Pro card. On a budget get the cheapest iMac.
2- The little guy, the Macbook is not too bad at all! Only 2.7x slower than the quickest of the bunch.
3- The score listed above for my mini in 2015 is 223s and I got 190s so I think, as we’ve experienced, Apple is making FCPx faster with every major release 🙂 15% faster is my test.
Again with R9 290 because Gigabyte R9 280x suddenly burned out. Also I found that FCP X 10.2.1 is much faster. Old result with FCP X 10.1.3 was 35 sec
Core i7 3770K
Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UP5 TH
16 GB Corsair RAM
SoftRAID 5 (4x3TB)
Yosemite 10.10.3 (256 GB SSD)
Final Cut Pro X 10.2.1
Radeon R9 290
BruceX test: 23,5 sec
Same computer but new FCP 10.2.2 and OSX 10.10.5 have much slower result: 35.5 sec
Something went wrong
MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Mid 2015)
2.8 GHz Intel Core i7
16 GB 1600 MHz DDR3
AMD Radeon R9 M370X 2048 MB
OSX 10.10.3
FCPX 10.2.1
BruceX test: 50.80 Sec
Mac Pro (Late 2013)
2.7Ghz 12-Core Intel Xeon E5
64GB 1866Mhz DDR3 ECC
AMD FirePro D700 6144MB
1TB Apple SSD
OSX Yosemite 10.10.3
FCP 10.2.1
BruceX test: 13.1 Sec
iMac (Retina 5K, 27-inch, Late 2014)
4GHz Intel Core i7
32 GB 1600 MHz DDR3
512GB Apple SSD
AMD Radeon R9 M295X 4096 MB
OSX Yosemite 10.10.3
FCPX 10.2.1
BruceX test: 42 Sec
Mac 4.1 – > flashed to 5.1
3,46 6core
24 GB 1366
256 GB PCI SSD
GTX 660 Strike (4k Display)
Prores 422 120 Sec
And just for fun testet today my old (6Years old PC GTX 480 Gigabyte)
Prores 422 only 49 Sec.
how is that possible ?
Xeon E5-2683 v3 @2GHz
R9 290 4GB
OS X El Capitan
FCPX 10.2.1
BruceX test: 17.2 sec
Mac 4.1 – > flashed to 5.1
3,46 6core
24 GB 1366
256 GB PCI SSD
MSI R9 280x (Non Flashed)
Prores 422 – 38 Seconds
Cannot import the xml ! FCP hangs, must force quit.
System : 10.10.4 / Fcpx 10.2 / GTX 970
MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Mid 2015)
2.8 GHz Intel Core i7
16 GB 1600 MHz DDR3
AMD Radeon R9 M370X 2048 MB
OSX 10.11 Beta (15A243d)
FCPX 10.2.1
BruceX test: 43.29 seconds
OSX El Capitan Cut 7 seconds off the render time on average compared to OS X 10.10.3.
Wonder if that is Metal Helping out.
i7 4790K – 11 sec – Custom Build by http://www.applekerala.com
———————————————————-
CPU: i7 4790K
RAM: 16Gb Hyperx 1866
MB Gigabyte Z97
SSD: Samsung 256Gb
Graphics : AMD Radeon R9 280X HD7xxx -3GB -custom Vbios by applekerala
BruceX test: 11 seconds
Core i7 3770
Gigabyte GA-Z77-UP5H (v1.0)
16 GB Corsair RAM
2TB HDD
Yosemite 10.10.3 (1.5TB)
Intel HD4000 + Final Cut Pro X 10.2.1 = 104 sec
Intel HD4000 + Final Cut Pro X 10.1.3 = 125 sec
nVidia 550Ti + Final Cut Pro X 10.1.3 = 107 sec
BruceX 5K test
PS: I have decided to keep HD4000 in my system because it seems super stable (vs FCPX crashes with 550Ti)
I did some tests at the apple store in France
MacBook Pro 13 inch, 2.7Ghz i5, 8Gb Ram, Intel Iris 6100 with 1.5Gb = 120s
MacBook Pro 15 inch 2.2Ghz i7, 16Gb Ram, Iris Pro with 1.5Gb = 60s
Imac retina 27 inch, 3,5 GHz i5, 8Gb Ram, AMD Radeon R9 M290X with 2Gb = 43s
MacPro 12 GB 1866 MHz DDR3, 3.7 HHz quad-core, Dual AMD FirePro D300 with 2 GB Ram each = 20s
Yosemite 10.10.5
FCPX 10.2.1
1) EVGA X58
i7 920@4.2Ghz +
24Gb DDR3 1600 +
3x R9 270X 4Gb = 13,20
2) P8H61-M LX2 +
i3 3220@3.3Ghz +
8Gb DDR 3 1600 +
1x GTX 680 4Gb = 62.97
3) P8H61-M LX2 +
i3 3220@3.3Ghz +
8Gb DDR 3 1600 +
1x GTX 280 1Gb = 73,49
Hackintosh (Asus z97 Pro wifi-ac,Clover)
i7 4790
R9 280x
32 GB 1866
Mac OS 10.9.5 FinalCut 10.1.3
stored on SSD drive as ProRs 422
13,4 sec (no other program but FinalCut running)
My Mini Hackintosh (fits in backpack) http://amzn.to/1Q8vtIR
i7-4790K
16GB RAM
GTX 960 4GB
250GB 850EVO SSD
BruceX 5K = 32 seconds (avg of 3 tests)
Just tested my new Late 2015 Retina 5K iMac
I7-6700K
16GB RAM
256GB SSD
4GB M395X
BruceX 5K Test, average of 5 tests = 17.5 seconds
Further to my test posted above:
Core i7 3770
Gigabyte GA-Z77-UP5H (v1.0)
16 GB Corsair RAM
2TB HDD (Data Drive)
Yosemite 10.10.4 (1.5TB)
MSI 7770 + Final Cut Pro X 10.2.2 = 55 sec
Surprisingly Fast (compared to before).
BruceX 5K test
On my Macbook Air (Haswell) – My 3rd Post here
1.3Ghz – i5
4GM Ram
Intel 5000 1.5GB Ram
2min 50 seconds = 170 seconds
Hopefully this will help someone make better decisions 🙂
MacPro 5,1
6-Core Intel Xeon @3.46 GHz
32GB RAM 1333
Samsung Pro 850 SSD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
ProRes 422 – BruceX test: 25 seconds
BlueBeast (my Hackintosh)
GPU: x280 (vapor-tri-x)
CPU: Inte 4790K
RAM: 16gb (crucial ballistic)
SSD: 500gb (Crucial M4)
El capitan
ficpx 10.2.2 (ProRes 422)
BruceX test: 00:14:05
(extremely happy about that result, built the Hackintosh specifically for using with FCPx).
tested my other macs
mac mini 2012 (i7, 16gb)
BruceX test: 01:33:07
Macbook pro 13retina late 2013 (i5, 8gb)
BruceX test: 01:53:31
BlueBeast (my Hackintosh)
GPU: x280 (vapor-tri-x)
CPU: Inte 4790K
RAM: 16gb (crucial ballistic)
SSD: 500gb (Crucial M4)
El capitan
ficpx 10.2.2 (ProRes 422)
BruceX test: 00:14:05
(extremely happy about that result, built the Hackintosh specifically for using with FCPx).
tested my other macs
mac mini 2012 (i7, 16gb)
BruceX test: 01:33:07
Macbook pro 13retina late 2013 (i5, 8gb)
BruceX test: 01:53:31
iMac 5K retina Display 8GB RAM, 256GB SSD, i5 3.5Ghz = “28.5s” !!
Hello,
Which is the version of Imac Retina 5K
Graphics board?
Thanks
Radeon 7970, 3gb flashed with boot screens and 5.0 gt/s
Mac Pro 2009, dual 2.93ghz, 16GB 1066mhz memory
SSD main drive, OWC Mercury Electra 3G, 240gb with TRIM enabler app.
BruceX test:
37 seconds on OSX 10.9.5 FCPX v10.0.9
120 seconds on OSX 10.10.5 FCPX 10.1.2 and v10.2.2
Something clearly happened in OSX 10.10 to make performance a lot slower. 😦 I could tell soon as I upgraded the OS.
In 2017, on OSX 10.11.6 with FCP 10.2.2, I am back to my previous good time of ~37 seconds.
Mac Pro 5,1 2010, originally 2.4GHz 8 core, since upgraded to 12-core 3.06Ghz Xeons
16G 1066 RAM
1Tb Samsung 840 on a Velocity Duo 6Gb SATA PCI card
EVGA Nvidia 960 (Mac EFI flashed) with 2GB VRAM
FCPX 10.2.2, El Capitan 10.11.3
Average 43 sec
I just put in the Nvidia, but neglected to run the test with the AMD 5870 1GB I had previously cuz I was hot to upgrade the performance of Fallout 4 on my Bootcamp partition…
Mac Pro (Early 2008) 2 x 3 GHz
20 GB RAM
ATI Radeon HD 5770
SSD 500 GB
Yosemite
59 sec.
Here’s mine;
iMac27 mid-2011, 32gb ram, 2tb raid0 ssd, gtx780m, elcapitan 10.11.3
render time = 19seconds
Hi Alex. Could you check this thread?: http://forums.macrumors.com/threads/fcpx-amd-vs-nvidia.1956128/
MacBook Pro Retina Mid 2012
2.3Ghz i7
8GB RAM
1GB 650M GPU
El Captain
76 Secs
Hackintosh (i7-4930k, MacPro6,1 SMBIOS)
32GB 1866Mhz
256GB OCZ Vector150 (3yo)
EVGA Nvidia GTX 970 FTW+
BruceX test (ProRes422):
32 seconds (OS X 10.11.4 beta, FCP X 10.2.2, Nvidia 346.03.06b01)
MacBook Retina 12″ did it in 2:40.77 min’s
CPU: 1.1GHz Intel Core M
Memory 8GB 1600Mhz DDR3
GPU Intel HD 5300 1536MB VRAM
Storage 250GB PCIe SSD
Mac Pro 4.1 2009 did it in 00:49.15 sec’s
CPU’s x2 2.26 GHz Quad-Core Inel Xeon E5520 (8 Cores 16 Threads)
Memory 40GB 1066Mhz DDR3 ECC
GPU Nvidia Geforce GTX 980 4GB VRAM
Storage 200GB intel SATA SSD
Hi, i created a form and a spreadsheet to collect all the results :
form : http://goo.gl/forms/Cyw207sxZd
spreadsheet : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GZSe16xQ4upT_9KuRLRQZMAqGdUPBCk7B1Ej_nFoqLo/edit?usp=sharing
El Capitan.
Average of 3 passes.
Hackintosh – Kleiner Bruder – i6700k@4900, 16GB-DDR4@3100, GTX970, SM951-512GB : 20.3sec.
Hackintosh – Großer Bruder – i6700k@4700, 16GB-DDR4@3100, GTX980TI, SM850-1TB : 15.2sec.
Mid 2012 MacPro 5,1 6-core 3.33ghz | 32gb ram | 480gb SSD
OSX EL Capitan 10.11.3
FCPX 10.2.3
QuickTime Player 7 (7.6.6)
AMD 5870 – 36 seconds
AMD SAPPHIRE HD 7950 Mac Edition – 22 seconds
Dual AMD SAPPHIRE HD 7950 Mac Edition – 17 seconds
HACKINTOSH – 17 sec !!! : )
———————————————————-
CPU: i7 3770K
RAM: 16Gb 1600
MB: Gigabyte B75M-D3H
SSD: SX900 256Gb
HDD DATA: 2 x 500 Gb IN RAID0
VGA: MSI 280x 3Gb
OSX: EL CAPTAIN 10.11.4
FCPX: 10.2.3
I HAD PREVIOUSLY YOSEMITE 10.10.5 – 29s
background rendering turned off before import?
18-22 seconds (18/22/19) so average is 19,6 seconds.
Mac Pro 2009 (flahed to become a 5,1) @3,06Ghz (12 cores)
GTX 980 (reference card from Nvidia) flashed with Mac EFI
48 GB RAM @1333 Mhz
2 x 850 EVO disks in RAID 0 om a Sonett Tempo Pro card
20 secs is pretty Damn good!!
MacBook Pro Mid-2012 13″
2.5 GHz Intel i5
16 GB 1600MHz DDR3
Internal 500 GB Samsung 850 EVO SSD
Intel HD 4000 1536MB
124.83 seconds
Ivy-E Hackintosh
4930K @4.4GHz
32GB RAM @2133MHz
MSI GTX 770 2GB (1 card hooked up to a single 27″ monitor)
10.11.5 El Cap
38 seconds using native Apple drivers
23 seconds using Nvidia Web drivers
For those running Nvidia cards natively supported by OS X, looks like the Web drivers are much better optimized for Open CL compared to Apple’s drivers.
HackPro core i7 4790
16 GB RAM
ATI Radeon 7950 3GB
SSD 256 GB 850 EVO
16.5s !!!
A new best right here!
10.8 seconds on a i7-6700K, 32GB DDR3 1867MHz, R9 M395X 4GB VRAM, 3TB Fusion Drive, 5K 27″ iMac!
New best here!
10.5 seconds on a 27″ Retina 5K 2015 iMac with a i7-6700K, 32GB DDR3 1867MHz RAM, AMD Radeon R9 M395X with 4GB of GDDR5 VRAM and a 3TB Fusion Drive!
have you turned off background rendering before import? result is impressive
Mac Pro (2008)
Processor: 2 x 3.2 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon
Memory: 16 GB 800 MHz DDR2 FB-DIMM
Graphics: Dual ATI Radeon HD 5770 1024 MB cards
Software: OS X 10.9.5
Drive: Samsung SSD 840 EVO 250GB
39 seconds!
Hackintosh Asus X99-A USB3.1
CPU: Intel Haswell E Processeur Core I7-5820K 3.50GHz
GPU : Titan X 12go
Mac OS : SIERRA 10.12.1
FCPX : 10.2.3
–> 18 sec.
Hackintosh Asus X99-A USB3.1
CPU: Intel Haswell E Processeur Core I7-5820K 3.50GHz
GPU : Titan X 12go
Mac OS : SIERRA 10.12.1
FCPX : 10.2.3
–> 18 sec.
Core i7 3770K
Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UP5 TH
16 GB Corsair RAM
Radeon R9 280X
SoftRAID 5 (4x3TB)
Sierra 10.12.1 (500 GB SSD)
Final Cut Pro X 10.2.3
BruceX test: 24,5 sec
Mac Pro mid 2010 12core 2.66
48 GB RAM
AMD Radeon 7970 3GB
El Cap 10.11.6, FCP X 10.3
internal SSD in dvd bay
34 sec. average
5th Post Here:
Core i7 3770
Gigabyte GA-Z77-UD5H (v1.1)
16 GB Corsair RAM
1.5TB HDD
Sierra 10.12.1 ( Same HDD 1.5TB)
AMD 7770 1gb + Final Cut Pro X 10.2.3 = 49 sec
BruceX 5K test
Will try with FCPX 10.3 soon and post result soon
Pingback: The Thunderbolt 3-equipped MacBook Pro can use external GPUs, but at a cost | Jamaican Moments™
2016 MacBook Pro with AMD Radeon Pro 460 – 46 seconds
Pingback: Thunderbolt 3-equipped MacBook Pro can use external GPUs, but at a cost - GetLogix
Pingback: REVIEW: MacBook Pro 2016 con Final Cut Pro X y DaVinci Resolve - finalcutpro.es
Seems to me this is a purely (or mostly) video card test. I have very similar results to the Mac Pro above me, which has more RAM, more cores, and a slightly older card (5770.)
Me:
2008 Mac Pro 1×2.8 (4 core)
8 GB RAM
Sierra (for the RX460 drivers)
ATI RX460 4 GB (~$120 at time of writing)
FCPX 10.2.2
I got basically the same result with SSD or the default internal 1TB drive:
48 seconds
Same Mac as I used above, but with the stock ATI HD 2600 XT 256MB
Stopped after two minutes, still at zero percent.
MacBook Pro Mid 2015
2.5GHz Core i7
16GB RAM
AMD Radeon R9 M370X 2048 MB
SSD 500GB
El Cap.
36sec
Mac Pro ( Early 2009 ) 1 x 2.66 Quad Core
12G 1066 RAM
EVGA NVidia 970 FTW 4 GB VRAM ( the last .5 slow. )
2TB Seagate 7200 RPM
FCPX 10.3.1 OSX Sierra 10.12.2 ( I flashed my 4,1 to 5,1 to install sierra)
79 seconds
Mac Pro 4,1 -> 5,1 8 Core (dual quads) + 12Gb ram
FCPX 10.3.1
GTX 980Ti 6Gb
Average ~29 seconds over 3 runs.
Is there anyting special about the drivers you use? I have dual 980Ti’s installed (in an expansion box, with the up to date web drivers) and i don’t come close to to 30 seconds. Also, playback in FCPX is jerky. THX!
MacBook Pro (13-inch, Late 2016, Two Thunderbolt 3 ports)
2 GHz Intel Core i5
8 GB 1867 MHZ LPDDR3
Intel Iris Graphics 540 1536 MB
84 seconds
Output on all tests using FCP 10.3.2
2015 iMac 5k 27″ 4GHz, 32GB RAM, Radeon R9 M395X 4GB OS 10.12.3 FCP 10.3.2
iMac to internal 3TB Fusion 32.61 & 32:45
iMac to Lacie Thunderbolt Drive 34:30
iMac to Lacie USB 3 Drive 33:15
2010 Mac Pro 12 core 2.93 40GB RAM, OS 10.11.3 , FCP 10.3.2 / GTX 980 Ti 6GB
Mac Pro to Internal 3 x 2TB Seagate Software RAID (only 250GB remaining ) 51.75 seconds
Will add more tests and configurations tomorrow.
Mac Pro (Early 2008) 2 x 3 GHz
20 GB RAM
ATI Radeon HD 7950 3 GB
SSD 500 GB
FCP 10.3.2
El Capitan
39 sec.
Hackintosh:
Gigabyte GA-Z97-HD3
i7-4790K 4.0GHz
MSI Radeon R9 270X 4GB GAMING LE
DDR3 16GB/1600
SSD Samsung 850 EVO 250GB SATA3
FCP 10.3.2
El Capitan
avarage: 25.4 sec
Using my limited budget Hackintosh:
Intel G860 @ 3 GHz
Gigabyte GA-H77-DS3H
8GB RAM
Nvidia GTX460 + ATI HD6850
mSATA Crucial 120GB
OSX 10.8.5
FCPX 10.0.8
177 seconds!
Again, using my limited budget Hackintosh:
Intel G860 @ 3 GHz
Gigabyte GA-H77-DS3H
8GB RAM
ATI HD6850 + ATI HD6850
mSATA Crucial 120GB
OSX 10.8.5
FCPX 10.0.8
93 seconds!
Clearly the HD 6850s have an advantage over the Nvidia GTX460 with FCPX
Again, using Hackintosh:
Intel G860 @ 3 GHz
Gigabyte GA-H77-DS3H
8GB RAM
ATI HD6850 + ATI HD6850
mSATA Crucial 120GB
OSX 10.12.4
FCPX 10.3.3
43 seconds!
Pretty chuffed with that result!
Hp Z820 dual 8 core cpu’s 16 core’s 32 Th’..
EVGA GTX 780 Ti Classified 3 GB
El Capitan
SSD 850 Evo 500GB
128Gb Ram 1600Mhz
36 sec.
VIDEO PRODUCTION HACKINTOSH – MAC PRO 6.1 – 10.4 sec (tested 5x)
——————————————————————————————————————
CPU: i7 3770K (3600MHz)
RAM: 16Gb Hdd Kingston (1866MHz)
MB Gigabyte GA-Z77-D3H
SSD: SX900 256Gb
HDD DATA: 1 x 1TB
VGA: 2x MSI 280x 3Gb
CASE: FRACTAL DESIGN C
800W POWER SUPPLY
OSX: El Captain 10.11.6, FCPX 10.2.3
FOR LIVE CAMERA SWITCH + STREAMING :
—————————————————————————
Blackmagic Design DeckLink Duo 2 + Blackmagic Design DeckLink Mini Monitor
Switcher software: Boinx mimoLIVE
hie friend…hows ur running two 280x cards in hackintosh??
Hackintosh
i7 4770 @ 3.7 GHz
32GB RAM
240GB SSD
Nvidia Geforce GTX 770 2GB
Mac OS 10.11.5
FCP 10.2.3
Nvidia Web driver
32s.
i7 970 3.4ghz Hex Core
24 GB RAM 1333MHz DDR3
Radeon 7970 Sapphire X 6GB
240GB Samsung 830 SSD
FCP 10.3.3
OS 10.11.6
28.9 Seconds
I thought my rig was rendering things slowly… But man, now I have to totally rethink the new rig I’m planning on building. Originally wanted to go for the GTX 1080 Ti… but now knowing what I know about ATi cards and OpenCL, I’m gonna have to hit the drawing board again.
Mackintosh
32Gb Corsair 1600 Ram
Nvidia GTX 760 2GB Graphics
Intel Core i7 4930K 3,9GHZ
Gigabyte GA-x79-UP4 Mobo
Seagate 500Gb 7200 RPM
FCPX 10.2.3
Yosemite 10.10.5
Average time for Bruce X: 51 seconds
MacBook Air 1.3ghz core i5 late 2013
8gb 265gb hd5000 1536 mb
fcp 10.2
Bruce X = 74sec
mackintosh skylake 6700K
32gig Ram
2 x HD 7950 – Gigabyte version
FCPX 10.3.3.
Sierra 10.12.5
Average 12 seconds
Mac Pro Early 2008
2 X 2.8Ghz
32 GB DDR2-667 Mhz
MSI GTX-980 Gaming X 4GBWDC
HDD : WD5000AAKS-00UU3A0
OS X 10.11.6
FCPX 10.2.3
Average time : 20 secs.
Hackintosh
Gigabyte Z97X-UD7 TH
Intel i7-4790k
32GB Corsair 1600 MHz
1 TB Samsung SSD (2x 500 GB Raid-0)
Gigabyte Aorus GTX 1080 TI
Mac OS 10.12.5
Final Cut Pro X 10.3.4
27,8 seconds
Hackintosh:
Ram: 16Gb Corsair Vengeance LPX DRR4 2400Mhz (Actual 2133Mhz, so not OC)
GPU: GTX 1050ti OC 4Gb GDDR5
CPU: Intel Core i7 6700K, running stock at 4.0Ghz (Turbo 4.2Ghz)
Motherboard: Gigabyte Z170X UD5 TH
SSD: Kingston 240Gb Uv300
Funal Cut Pro X: 10.3.3
MacOS: Sierra 10.12.5
Average time: 44 seconds.
Quite strange the fact that frequency, ram size and processor don’t make much difference in this test (except the price tag), and even the GPU don’t seem to do much else. Is there maybe some settings that could be used to tweak the performance under this aspect?
It’s the Nvidia GPU. FCPX is specifically made to perform better with Radeon GPUs. It sucks but it’s true.
Yeah I reckoned. Such a shame as that kind of software would perform at least twice as better/faster on Windows, with the right drivers. Even on OpenGL it lacks a decent score, proving to be around 5 to 6 times faster on my Windows (DirectX) against MacOS. Thanks for the reply by the way
Hackintosh:
Ram: Crucial – Ballistix Sport LT 16Gb DRR4 2400Mhz
GPU: Sapphire – Radeon R9 280X 3GB Dual-X
CPU: Intel Core i7 6700K, OC’d to 4.6Ghz
Motherboard:Asus Z170-AR
SSD: OCZ – Vertex 2 60GB
Final Cut Pro X: 10.3.4
MacOS: Sierra 10.12.5
Average time: 26 seconds.
Hackintosh:
Ram: Crucial – Ballistix Sport LT 16Gb DRR4 2400Mhz
GPU: Sapphire – Radeon R9 280X 3GB Dual-X
CPU: Intel Core i7 6700K, OC’d to 4.6Ghz
Motherboard:Asus Z170-AR
SSD: OCZ – Vertex 2 60GB
Final Cut Pro X: 10.3.4
MacOS: Sierra 10.12.5
Average time: 26 seconds.
Hackintosh Built :
Ram: 32Gb Kingstone 1600Mhz (not overclocked)
GPU: Saphire r9 280x 3GB ddr5
CPU: Intel Core i5 4690 (not overclocked)
Motherboard: Gigabyte H97M-D3H
SSD: Samsung EVO850 240Gb
MacOS: Sierra 10.11.6
Final Cut Pro X: 10.2.3
Video Codec: Apple ProRes 422
Resolution: 5120×2700
Average time: 19 seconds
Average time: 33 seconds With Nvidia GTX 760 2GB ddr5
Conclusion: AMD cards are more faster than NVDIA cards in mac OS X bcz operating systems GUI is openCL based. Final Cut Pro X is OpenCL base application and we know all that support for OpenCL is very powerful in AMD cards than NVDIA cards. If u r FCPX editor. Switch to AMD cards.
105 seconds on MacBook Pro (Retina, 15 inch, Mid 2015). 2.2GHz i7, 16GB RAM, Intel Iris Pro 1536MB
26 seconds on Mac Pro (Late 2013). 3.5 GHz 6-core Xeon E5, 32GB RAM, AMD FirePro D500 3072MB
Macbook Pro 13 Mid 2012
CPU: Intel Core I5 3210M 2.5 GHz
Ram: 16 GB 1600MHz DDR3 Corsair
SSD: Samsung 850 EVO SSD 500GB
GPU: Intel HD 4000 1536MB
Mac OS Sierra 10.12.6
Final Cut Pro 10.2.1
114.6 Seconds
Hackintosh HP Probook 4530S
CPU: Intel Core i3 2350M 2.3 GHZ
Ram: 8 GB 1333MHz DDR3
SSD: Kingstone SV300 128 GB
GPU: Intel HD 3000 512MB
Mac OS El Capitan 10.11.5
Final Cut Pro 10.2.1
838.8 Seconds
Hackintosh HP Probook 4530S
CPU: Intel Core i7 2630QM 2.00 GHZ
Ram: 8 GB 1333MHz DDR3
SSD: HyperX FURY SSD 120GB
GPU: Intel HD 3000 512 MB
Mac OS El Capitan 10.11.5
Final Cut Pro 10.2.1
803.9 Seconds
Hackintosh (built in 2012, upgraded over the years)
Gigabyte z68x-ud3h-b3
i7 2700K @ 3.5Ghz stock (3.9 Turbo)
32GB 1600 MHz G.Skill Ram
1TB Samsung 850 Evo SSD
Gigabyte GTX 1080 Windforce
Mac OS 10.12.6
FCP X 10.3.3
32 sec
iMac (Retina 5K, 27-inch, Late 2015)
3.3 GHz Intel Core i5 ——–32 GB 2133 MHz DDR3
AMD RX580 8 GB ——–TB2 Sandisk SSD
FCP X 10.3.4 Mac OS 10.13 beta
20 sec
I have a Hackintosh running MacOS 10.12.6 on an Intel i7 5820K processor (overclocked to 4.3 GHz), 32 GB Corsair 2400 MHz DDR4 RAM, a Gigabyte X99 UD4 board, and an ASUS NVidia GTX960 OC Strix Edition Video Card with 4GB DDR5 VRAM. I am getting an average time of 11 seconds on the BruceX 5K benchmark in FCPX 10.3.4. I am using the System Definition of iMac15,1 (which seemed appropriate for my hardware), and background rendering is turned off.
Is that normal?
Mac Pro 1.1 (Up to 2.1)
2 x 2.66 Ghz Dual Core Intel Xeon
32 GB 667 DDR-2 FB-DIMM
NVidia GeForce GTX 680 2048 MB
RAID-0 2xWD 160 SATA-2
90 sec
Hackintosh. MacOS Sierra.
Gigabyte GA-P55-USB3 , using Mac Pro 5,1 SMBIOS
2.93GHz Core i7 870
16GB 1333MHz DDR3 RAM
ASUS Radeon HD 7750 1GB DDR5 RAM
Exported video codec Prores 422 to RAM drive.
59 sec
Mac Pro 5,1 (2010)
2 x 2.4GHz Xeon (8 cores)
Sapphire AMD RX 580 8GB
64GB 1066 DDR3
500GB SSD
FCP X 10.3.4 MacOS 10.12.16
38 seconds
MacBook Pro mid 2017 15″
3,1 Ghz Intel Core i7 (Kaby Lake)
16gb Ram
Intel HD Graphics 630 1536 MB
Radeon Pro 560 4GB
512 GB SSD
35 sec
Butter Smooth
Thanks for the instructions Alex.
15 sec, ran it 4 times.
Specs:
GA-H97m-d3H
i7 4790k
R9 390 8GB
120 GB Toshiba SSD
FCP X 10.3.4
macOS 10.13 (Final)
2013 Mac Pro
CPU: 2.5 GHz 12-Core Intel Xeon E5-2696V2
RAM: 64GB DDR3 1866MHZ
SSD: 512GB Samsung SM951 NVME
Dual AMD D300 2GB + TB2 eGPU AMD RX 580 8GB
10.45 sec
2012 Mac Pro
CPU: 2×3.46GHz (12-Core) Intel Xeon X5690
RAM: 96GB DDR3 1333MHZ
SSD: 480GB Kingston M.2 PCIe AHCI
AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB
14.88 sec (4 runs)
2012 Mac Pro
CPU: 2×3.46GHz (12-Core) Intel Xeon X5690
RAM: 96GB DDR3 1333MHZ
SSD: 480GB Kingston M.2 PCIe AHCI
Dual AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB
12.23 sec (4 runs)
Quite similar configuration it’s clear that pure macOS wins … I did 14-15 sec on Hackintosh AMD with a 6 core 12 thread CPU and XFX RX580 …
Maybe newer macOS (Hackintosh or not) has better performance … I’m stuck on 10.13.3 for now
2012 Mac Pro
CPU: 2×3.46GHz (12-Core) Intel Xeon X5690
RAM: 96GB DDR3 1333MHZ
SSD: 480GB Kingston M.2 PCIe AHCI
AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB +AMD Radeon R9 280x 3GB
15.56 sec / 18.45 sec (4 runs) – (580 Primary / R9 280 x Primary)
2018 hack build
CPU: Intel i7 8700k stock
RAM: 16gb DDR4 Corsair Dominator
SSD: Intel DC P3600 1.6tb
GPU1: AMD Radeon RX580
GPU2: AMD Radeon RX580
Single GPU: 13 sec
Dual GPU: 8 sec
High Sierra / FCPX 10.4
Pingback: Is there a difference between a Thunderbolt 2 and 3 external GPU in your 2017 MacBook Pro? - Gamers Kids - Gaming, Anime, DC, Marvel
Mid-2017 MacBook Pro 15″
CPU: 2.9 GHz Intel Core i7 7820HQ (Kaby Lake)
RAM: 16GB 2133MHz LPDDR3
SSD: 512GB Apple SSD (Advertised up to 3.2 GB/s)
GPU: – Primary: AMD Radeon 560 Pro – 4GB Video Memory
– Secondary: Intel HD Graphics 630 – 1.5 GB Video Memory
45.08 Seconds (1 Run)
iMac Pro (2017)
3 GHz Intel Xeon W 10 Core
64 GB 2666 MHz DDR4
Radeon Pro Vega 64 16368 MB
macOS High Sierra 10.13.5
12 sec. (3 run)
2013 Hackintosh with upgrades down the line
4,3GHz Intel Core i5-4670K
32GB 2400MHz DDR3
AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB
Samsung 960 EVO NVMe SSD
macOS 10.13.6
17 sec. (3 runs)
Hackintosh Ryzen 5 2600 – 3.4GHz
16 GB 2800 MHz DDR4
XFX RX580 8GB
macOS High Sierra 10.13.3 (AMD Hackintosh)
14-15 sec (5 runs)
Hi, what motherboard you have used
Pingback: MacOS High Sierra vs Mojave Performance on Hackintosh - BarTechTV
Pingback: Best Hackintosh Graphics cards for Mojave - BarTechTV
2014 Hackintosh
R9 280X GPU, Sapphire Radeon Toxic 3GB GDDR5
Core i7-4770K CPU, Intel 4 cores, 8 threads 3.5GHz
32GB RAM, G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series DDR3 1600
GA-Z87X-OC Force MB, Gigabyte
256GB SSD, Crucial M550
macOS Mojave 10.14.2, FCP-X 10.4
27 sec. (5 runs average)
MB Pro 13″ 2017 (cheapest one wo TB) + EGPU Vega 56 Gigabyte Gaming
18s
macbook pro 13 2018 + eGPU rx580 – 17 sec
Pingback: The best Hackintosh graphics cards for 2019 - BarTechTV
Mac Pro (Mid 2012)
2 x 2,66 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon
16 GB 1333 MHz DDR3
ATI Radeon HD 5770 1024 MB
internal HDD
01:21
iMac (Retina 5K, 27-inch, 2017)
4,2 GHz Intel Core i7
16 GB 2133 MHz DDR4
Radeon Pro 580 8192 MB
to internal disk
mojave 10.14
18 sec
Hackintosh with:
i3 8100
RX 580 nitro+ 8Gb
HyperX 8Gb DDR4 2133Mhz CL 14 latency
120Gb SSD HyperX on SATA.
Mac OS X Mojave 10.14.3, Final Cut Pro 10.4.3
Test without Background render:
11 seconds
Test with Background render:
9 seconds
I’m really blown away with this results.
With background render it should be a 1 sec or something.
Hi Sinosoidal, Good result of your test. Can you please let me know is your said Hackintosh with mentioned parts are still giving same result as long run also, I am planning to prepare one Hackintosh. Thanks a lot in advance and good luck.
hack i7 4790k @ 4000Ghz
RX 480 nitro+ 8gb
16GB ddr3 1333
256 SSD radeon ssd
mojave 10.14.2
FCPX 10.4.5
19 secs. =(
iHacPro: Franky
2.1 GHz 10-Core Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 ES cpu
ASUS X99-Deluxe USB3.1
RX VEGA 56 8GB
64GB DDR 1866
520GB Samsung Evo NVMeSSD Drive
mojave 10.14.2
FCPX 10.4
22.9 Seconds….I’m happy with that result for a 3-year-old machine I pieced together.
Mac Mini i5 (2018)
16 GB HyperX 8Gb DDR4 2667Mhz CL 14
eGPU: MSI Vega 56 AirBoost 8 GB OC
2 TB Intel 660p (NVMe) via external TB3-enclosure (i-tec)
internal SSD: 512 GB
16.4 seconds
Hackintosh Build:
i7 9700K 8 Cores
16 GB DDR5 OC 3000Mhz RAM
Samsung M.2 SSD 256 GB
Sapphire RX 580 DDR5 8 GB Graphics
Running Mac OS Mojave 10.14.4
14 Seconds when Video Codec is Apple ProRes 4444XQ
8 Seconds when Video Codec is Apple ProRes 444 / LT
Hackintosh;
asus h110m-k
i3 6100
8gb ddr4 2134mhz
rx580 4gb
24,4 seconds
iHacPro: 14C
3.1 GHz 14-Core Intel i9-7940X cpu
MSI X299 RAIDER
RX VEGA FE 8GB
32GB DDR 3000MHz DDR4
480Gb NVMeSSD Drive
mojave 10.14.5
FCPX: 10.4.5
Time:14.8 Seconds
Hackintosh
i9-7900X
Asus Prime X299 Deluxe
Powercolor Radeon VII
32 GB DDR4 2133
250 GB Intel SATA SSD
Mojave 10.14.5
FCPX: 10.4.6
Time 15.8 sec
Hackintosh (Bios Ozmosis)
i5-3570K 4GHz
GIGABYTE GA-Z77-DS3H (rev. 1.1)
6GB DDR3 1600
SSD Crucial BX500 120GB
MSI AMD Radeon RX 560 AERO ITX OC 4G
macOS Mojave 10.14.6
FCPX 10.4.6
Time 30 sec
Hackintosh i9-9900K
Asus Prime Z390-A
Radeon RX Vega 64 +Nitro 8 GB
Kingston 16 GB 3200MHz HyperX DDR4 NEW Predator x 2 (32GB)
Raid (Red pro 2tb x 4 = 8TB raid)
SSD Samsung 970 Pro 512 GB, PCIe NVMe, M.2 80mm
Mojave 10.14.6
FcpX 10.4.5
time 12.4 sec
i7 3770K@4.5ghz
32GB DDR3 1600mhz
RX580
MacOS 10.14.6
FCPX 10.4.7
13.5 sec
7920x Hackintosh (10.15,1)
Radeon VII (custom ppt)
FCPX 10.4.7
6.8 sec
i7 8700
Sapphire Nitro+ RX 5700 XT
32GB DDR4 2666
MacOS 10.15.1
FCPX 10.4.7
7.06 seconds
iMac 2019
I5-9600K 3,7Ghz
RX580x 8Gb
16 Gb RAM DDR4 2666Mhz
512 SSD
Catalina 10.15.1
FCPX 10.4.7
12.8 sec
Hackintosh (iMac19,1)
i7-9700k @ 3.6 GHz
16 GB DDR4-3600
AMD Radeon 5700 XT
1 TB Samsung 870 Evo NVMe M.2 SSD
macOS 10.15.1
FCPX 10.4.7
6.64 seconds (average of 3 runs)
Hackintosh (iMac19,1)
i7-9700k @ 3.6 GHz
16 GB DDR-3600
1 TB NVMe M.2 SSD
macOS 10.15.1
FCPX 10.4.7
6.64 (average of 3 runs)
Forgot the GPU 🤦🏻♂️
Radeon 5700 XT (8 GB)
I have a really old machine. But it still rocks!
Mac Pro 2.1
Two Xeons x5356 3.0 Ghz
32 GB 667 MHz DDR2 FB-DIMM
1TB Sata SSD
Dual Radeon 7950
Mac Os X El Capitan 10.11.6
22.83 sec
Pingback: Mac mini video editing setup under $2,000 – Tech News
Ryzen Hackintosh
35 seconds
Hardware: AMD Ryzen R5 3600 + MSI B450M Mortar Max + XFX RX5600XT + G.Skill 8G×2 DDR4 3200MHz + West Digital SN550 1TB + BCM94360CD PCI-E Wireless Card
System: Catalina 10.15.4
Software: Final Cut Pro X 10.4.8 Trial
Hackintosh booter: OpenCore 0.5.8
Pingback: Creating a Mac mini video editing setup for under $2,000 [Video] – Imac Guide
Hardware: AMD Ryzen R9 3900X + AsRock ITX TB3 + Saphire RX5700XT + G.Skill 32G DDR4 3200MHz
1TB NVMe M.2 SSD Sabrent 4000mb/s + BCM94360CD PCI-E Wireless Card
System: Big Sur 11.0.1
Software: Final Cut Pro 10.5
Hackintosh booter: OpenCore 6.0.3
6.36 seconds
Pingback: Apple MacBook Air M1 Review for Photography Needs | Cool Gadgets
Mac Pro (4.1 flashed to 5.1)
2 x 3.06 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon
24 GB 1333 MHz DDR3
Nvidia GXT 780 3 GB
Samsung EVO 840 SSD
OS 10.15.7 FCP 10.5.4
23.80 Sec.
Just got a new M1 Max, tried to import BruceX to test the brand new machine, but I got a DTD version error. Where can I get a updated xml file to test? Thanks
Thanks for trying BruceX on your new Mac! There are reports that 10.6 has a bug (because parts have been rewritten in Swift) that means that only systems whose language is set to English and region is set to an English region can import XML. Is your system set to English and region to UK, Australia or US?
Sorry but there’s nothing I can do to the XML to fix this.
Hi Macbrush. I’ve changed this post to help. Get get around the XML bug in 10.6, I’ve changed the XML file to a Final Cut library. Hope this works for you. Download it from https://alex4d.com/BruceX.fcpbundle.zip
Just tried with a base 14” M1 Pro MacBook Pro – 16 GB RAM – 512 GB SSD – 8 cores CPU and 14 cores GPU:
Only 13 seconds on ProRes 422… amazing
My Mac Studio with the Ultra chipset performed it in 10 seconds.