1. Richard D. Pepperman said:

    To be a bit more precise, the quote should include the words “obsession” and “with”.
    “…seduction of matching action and the obsession with staying in sync.”
    Perhaps “matching action” is an obvious obstacle in comparison to “staying in sync,” because it (more than any other single approach to editing) promotes benign constructions with a concentration on ‘in & out’ points; easily ignoring larger and far more vital considerations.

    Sync. obsessions interfere with the fullness of an actor’s film performance, especially because they give too little credit to rhythms and reactions, focusing instead on the dialogue and speaker; thereby encouraging ‘words’ to drive the film scene.

  2. Richard D. Pepperman said:

    Hi Alex,
    Let me apologize for taking all this time to ‘reply’ to your ‘reply’, but at my age time zooms right on by!
    Your blog about “not letting words drive the editing” is terrific, and I’ll use it as an exercise in my editing classes.
    I have also found that the eyes of characters render excellent clues to editing (cutting) motivation; in large part because we tend to look into each other’s eyes during conversation – whether live or on screen!
    Keep up the ongoing good work. I thank you,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: